Tag Archives: Data Governance

Integrating AI and LLMs into Regulated Financial Services Data Platforms

How AI fits into Bronze/Silver/Gold without breaking lineage, PIT, or SMCR: This article sets out a regulator-defensible approach to integrating AI and LLMs into UK Financial Services data platforms (structurally accurate for 2025/2026). It argues that AI must operate as a governed consumer and orchestrator of a temporal medallion architecture, not a parallel system. By defining four permitted integration patterns, PIT-aware RAG, controlled Bronze embeddings, anonymised fine-tuning, and agentic orchestration, it shows how to preserve lineage, point-in-time truth, and SMCR accountability while enabling practical AI use under PRA/FCA scrutiny.

Continue reading →

Foundational Architecture Decisions in a Financial Services Data Platform

This article defines a comprehensive architectural doctrine for modern Financial Services data platforms, separating precursor decisions (what must be true for trust and scale) from foundational decisions (how the platform behaves under regulation, time, and organisational pressure). It explains why ingestion maximalism, streaming-first eventual consistency, transactional processing at the edge, domain-first design, and freshness as a business contract are non-negotiable in FS. Through detailed narrative and explicit anti-patterns, it shows how these decisions preserve optionality, enable regulatory defensibility, support diverse communities, and prevent the systemic failure modes that quietly undermine large-scale financial data platforms.

Continue reading →

Time, Consistency, and Freshness in a Financial Services Data Platform

This article explains why time, consistency, and freshness are first-class architectural concerns in modern Financial Services data platforms. It shows how truth in FS is inherently time-qualified, why event time must be distinguished from processing time, and why eventual consistency is a requirement rather than a compromise. By mapping these concepts directly to Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum layers, the article demonstrates how platforms preserve historical truth, deliver reliable current-state views, and enforce freshness as an explicit business contract rather than an accidental outcome.

Continue reading →

Measuring Value in a Modern FS Data Platform: Framework for Understanding, Quantifying, and Communicating Data Value in FS

Measuring Value in a Modern FS Data Platform reframes how Financial Services organisations should evaluate data platforms. Rather than measuring pipelines, volumes, or dashboards, true value emerges from consumption, velocity, optionality, semantic alignment, and control. By landing raw data, accelerating delivery through reuse, organising around business domains, and unifying meaning in a layered Bronze–Silver–Gold–Platinum architecture, modern platforms enable faster decisions, richer analytics, regulatory confidence, and long-term adaptability. This article provides a practical, consumption-driven framework for CDOs and CIOs to quantify and communicate real data value.

Continue reading →

East/West vs North/South Promotion Lifecycles: How Modern Financial Services Data Platforms Support Operational Stability and Analytical Freedom Simultaneously

This article argues that modern Financial Services (FS) data platforms must deliberately support two distinct but complementary promotion lifecycles. The well known and understood North/South lifecycle provides operational stability, governance, and regulatory safety for customer-facing and auditor-visible systems. In parallel, the East/West lifecycle enables analytical exploration, experimentation, and rapid innovation for data science and analytics teams. By mapping these lifecycles onto layered data architectures (Bronze to Platinum) and introducing clear promotion gates, FS organisations can protect operational integrity while sustaining analytical freedom and innovation.

Continue reading →

Consumers of a Financial Services Data Platform: Who They Are, What They Need, and How Modern Architecture Must Support Them

This article examines who consumes a modern Financial Services data platform and why their differing needs must shape its architecture. It identifies four core consumer groups, operational systems, analytics communities, finance and reconciliation functions, and governance and regulators, alongside additional emerging consumers. By analysing how each group interacts with data, the article explains why layered architectures, dual promotion flows, and semantic alignment are essential. Ultimately, it argues that platform value is defined by consumption, not ingestion or technology choices.

Continue reading →

Multi-Domain Temporal Data: How to Avoid Single-Domain SCD2 Failures

Building a cross-domain temporal backbone that actually works in Financial Services. Financial Services firms often build robust SCD2 history within individual domains, yet still fail when asked to reconstruct cross-domain state at a point in time. This article explains why single-domain SCD2 is insufficient and sets out a practical design for a multi-domain temporal backbone spanning Customer, Account, Party, Product, Contract, and Transactions. It shows how to align entity history, temporal relationships, and bi-temporal transactional facts to support defensible point-in-time analysis across risk, conduct, AML, remediation, and regulatory use cases.

Continue reading →

Gold & Platinum Layer Architecture After Silver

Modern Financial Services data platforms require more than Bronze, Silver, and Gold layers to manage complexity, meaning, and governance. While Silver provides current-state truth and Gold delivers consumption-driven business meaning, neither resolves enterprise-wide semantics. This article introduces the Platinum layer as the conceptual truth layer, reconciling how different domains, systems, and analytical communities understand the same data. Together, Gold and Platinum bridge operational use, analytical insight, and long-lived domain semantics, enabling clarity, velocity, and governed understanding at scale.

Continue reading →

Managing a Rapidly Growing SCD2 Bronze Layer on Snowflake: Best Practices and Architectural Guidance

Slowly Changing Dimension Type 2 (SCD2) patterns are widely used in Snowflake-based Financial Services platforms to preserve full historical change for regulatory, analytical, and audit purposes. However, Snowflake’s architecture differs fundamentally from file-oriented lakehouse systems, requiring distinct design and operational choices. This article provides practical, production-focused guidance for operating large-scale SCD2 Bronze layers on Snowflake. It explains how to use Streams, Tasks, micro-partition behaviour, batching strategies, and cost-aware configuration to ensure predictable performance, controlled spend, and long-term readiness for analytics and AI workloads in regulated environments.

Continue reading →

Managing a Rapidly Growing SCD2 Bronze Layer on Databricks: Best Practices and Practical Guidance ready for AI Workloads

Slowly Changing Dimension Type 2 (SCD2) patterns are increasingly used in the Bronze layer of Databricks-based platforms to meet regulatory, analytical, and historical data requirements in Financial Services. However, SCD2 Bronze tables grow rapidly and can become costly, slow, and operationally fragile if not engineered carefully. This article provides practical, production-tested guidance for managing large-scale SCD2 Bronze layers on Databricks using Delta Lake. It focuses on performance, cost control, metadata health, and long-term readiness for analytics and AI workloads in regulated environments.

Continue reading →

Governance & Metadata That Actually Survive a PRA Review

Turning catalogues, glossaries, and lineage tools into something regulators will actually trust. Most Financial Services organisations invest heavily in data catalogues, glossaries, and lineage tools: yet still struggle to satisfy regulators when asked to explain where data comes from, what it means, and how decisions were made over time. This article focuses on governance and metadata that actually survive Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) scrutiny. It sets out a practical model for connecting semantics, lineage, rules, and accountability, so regulated firms can move beyond decorative governance and confidently explain historical outcomes with evidence, not anecdotes.

Continue reading →

Production-Grade Testing for SCD2 & Temporal Pipelines

The testing discipline that prevents regulatory failure, data corruption, and sleepless nights in Financial Services. Slowly Changing Dimension Type 2 pipelines underpin regulatory reporting, remediation, risk models, and point-in-time evidence across Financial Services — yet most are effectively untested. As data platforms adopt CDC, hybrid SCD2 patterns, and large-scale reprocessing, silent temporal defects become both more likely and harder to detect. This article sets out a production-grade testing discipline for SCD2 and temporal pipelines, focused on determinism, late data, precedence, replay, and PIT reconstruction. The goal is simple: prevent silent corruption and ensure SCD2 outputs remain defensible under regulatory scrutiny.

Continue reading →

Event-Driven CDC to Correct SCD2 Bronze in 2025–2026

Broken history often stays hidden until remediation or skilled-person reviews. Why? Event-driven Change Data Capture fundamentally changes how history behaves in a data platform. When Financial Services organisations move from batch ingestion to streaming CDC, long-standing SCD2 assumptions quietly break — often without immediate symptoms. Late, duplicated, partial, or out-of-order events can silently corrupt Bronze history and undermine regulatory confidence. This article sets out what “correct” SCD2 means in a streaming world, why most implementations fail, and how to design Bronze pipelines that remain temporally accurate, replayable, and defensible under PRA/FCA scrutiny in 2025–2026.

Continue reading →

Golden-Source Resolution, Multi-Source Precedence, and Regulatory Point-in-Time Reporting on SCD2 Bronze

Why Deterministic Precedence Is the Line Between “Data Platform” and “Regulatory Liability”. Modern UK Financial Services organisations ingest customer, account, and product data from 5–20 different systems of record, each holding overlapping and often conflicting truth. Delivering a reliable “Customer 360” or “Account 360” requires deterministic, audit-defensible precedence rules, survivorship logic, temporal correction workflows, and regulatory point-in-time (PIT) reconstructions: all operating on an SCD2 Bronze layer. This article explains how mature banks resolve multi-source conflicts, maintain lineage, rebalance history when higher-precedence data arrives late, and produce FCA/PRA-ready temporal truth. It describes the real patterns used in Tier-1 institutions, and the architectural techniques required to make them deterministic, scalable, and regulator-defensible.

Continue reading →

From SCD2 Bronze to a Non-SCD Silver Layer in Snowflake

This article explains a best-practice Snowflake pattern for transforming an SCD2 Bronze layer into a non-SCD Silver layer that exposes clean, current-state data. By retaining full historical truth in Bronze and using Streams, Tasks, and incremental MERGE logic, organisations can efficiently materialise one-row-per-entity Silver tables optimised for analytics. The approach simplifies governance, reduces cost, and delivers predictable performance for BI, ML, and regulatory reporting, while preserving complete auditability required in highly regulated financial services environments.

Continue reading →

From SCD2 Bronze to a Non-SCD Silver Layer in Databricks

This article explains a best-practice Databricks lakehouse pattern for transforming fully historical SCD2 Bronze data into clean, non-SCD Silver tables. Bronze preserves complete temporal truth for audit, compliance, and investigation, while Silver exposes simplified, current-state views optimised for analytics and data products. Using Delta Lake features such as MERGE, Change Data Feed, OPTIMIZE, and ZORDER, organisations, particularly in regulated Financial Services, can efficiently maintain audit-proof history while delivering fast, intuitive, consumption-ready datasets.

Continue reading →

Operationalising SCD2 at Scale: Monitoring, Cost Controls, and Governance for a Healthy Bronze Layer

This article explains how to operationalise Slowly Changing Dimension Type 2 (SCD2) at scale in the Bronze layer of a medallion architecture, with a focus on highly regulated Financial Services environments. It outlines three critical pillars: monitoring, cost control, and governance, needed to keep historical data trustworthy, performant, and compliant. By tracking growth patterns, preventing meaningless updates, controlling storage and compute costs, and enforcing clear governance, organisations can ensure their Bronze layer remains a reliable audit-grade historical asset rather than an unmanaged data swamp.

Continue reading →

Scaling the SCD2 Bronze Layer: Practical Strategies for Financial Services

A rapidly growing SCD2 Bronze layer is an expected outcome of implementing full historical tracking across financial services data platforms, where high-frequency attribute changes, noisy upstream systems, and long regulatory retention periods contribute to rapid data growth. This article outlines practical engineering strategies to keep SCD2 Bronze efficient and cost-effective, including effective partitioning, change-suppression logic, hot–warm–cold tiering, compaction and lifecycle optimisation, windowed processing, metadata offloading, and upstream data contracts. Advanced approaches, such as attribute-level SCD2, hybrid SCD2/delta-merge patterns, and hash-based change detection, further enhance scalability for mature platforms. The piece concludes that SCD2 growth is not a failure but a natural result of robust governance. With the right architecture and operational discipline, organisations can maintain an auditable, scalable, and regulator-aligned Bronze layer ready for analytics, AI, and Data Mesh.

Continue reading →

Using SCD2 in the Bronze Layer with a Non-SCD2 Silver Layer: A Modern Data Architecture Pattern for UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services firms increasingly implement SCD2 history in the Bronze layer while providing simplified, non-SCD2 current-state views in the Silver layer. This pattern preserves full historical auditability for FCA/PRA compliance and regulatory forensics, while delivering cleaner, faster, easier-to-use datasets for analytics, BI, and data science. It separates “truth” from “insight,” improves governance, supports Data Mesh models, reduces duplicated logic, and enables deterministic rebuilds across the lakehouse. In regulated UK Financial Services today, it is the only pattern I have seen that satisfies the full, real-world constraint set with no material trade-offs.

Continue reading →

WTF Is SCD? A Practical Guide to Slowly Changing Dimensions

Slowly Changing Dimensions (SCDs) are how data systems manage attributes that evolve without constantly rewriting history. They determine whether you keep only the latest value, preserve full historical versions, or maintain a limited snapshot of changes. The classic SCD types (0–3, plus hybrids) define different behaviours… from never updating values, to overwriting them, to keeping every version with timestamps. The real purpose of SCDs is to make an explicit choice about how truth should behave in your analytics: what should remain fixed, what should update, and what historical context matters. Modern data platforms make tracking changes easy, but they don’t make the design decisions for you. SCDs are ultimately the backbone of reliable, temporal, reality-preserving analytics.

Continue reading →