This article explores how masking, often necessary for those with Asperger Syndrome, complicates the accuracy of personality typing systems. Drawing from personal experiences in a challenging post-war inner-city environment, it critiques the limitations of these systems in truly capturing one’s authentic self and offers insights into the interplay between identity, masking, and neurodiversity.
Continue reading
In the world of personality and strengths assessment, both the DISC profile and Gallup’s CliftonStrengths (formerly known as StrengthsFinder) have carved significant niches. These tools offer unique insights into individual behaviors and strengths, assisting in personal development, effective team dynamics, and leadership strategies. But how do these two models relate, and can they be coherently mapped onto each other? Here’s an exploration.
Continue reading
In the realm of professional development and team dynamics, Deloitte’s Business Chemistry and Gallup’s Strengths Model (often known as CliftonStrengths or formerly StrengthsFinder) stand out as two well-regarded assessment tools. Both aim to optimize workplace performance, but they approach individual personalities and strengths from distinct angles. Here’s a closer look at how the two might be mapped onto each other.
Continue reading
Two of the most popular personality and strengths assessment tools in contemporary times are the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the Gallup Strengths Model (often known as CliftonStrengths or formerly as StrengthsFinder). Both instruments offer unique insights into the inner workings of individuals, aiding in personal development, team dynamics, and leadership strategies. But how do these two models intersect, and can they be mapped onto each other? Let’s dive in.
Continue reading
The Gallup Strengths Model, better known as CliftonStrengths (and formerly as StrengthsFinder), has its roots in a shift towards positive psychology and the goal of understanding what makes people excel. Here’s a brief history of its development.
Continue reading
The Gallup Strengths Model, often referred to as the CliftonStrengths or formerly StrengthsFinder, is widely acknowledged as a leading tool in personal development, leadership training, and team building. Rooted in positive psychology and developed by Donald O. Clifton, this assessment provides insights into 34 talent themes, suggesting that when individuals are aware of and lean into their inherent strengths, they can achieve optimal performance. However, as with any prominent psychological or developmental model, the CliftonStrengths has its critics. This article delves into a critical analysis of the model, weighing its potential benefits against the critiques.
Continue reading
The Gallup Strengths, often referred to as CliftonStrengths (formerly known as StrengthsFinder), is a personality tool and development methodology based on the work of psychologist Donald O. Clifton. It’s designed to help individuals identify, understand, and maximize their unique talents and strengths.
Continue reading
Provides a mapping across the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), Deloitte’s Business Chemistry, DISC, and Gallup Strengths frameworks, illustrating potential intersections among different personality typologies. By dissecting each MBTI personality type based on four dichotomies (Extraversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving), the table attempts to map them to corresponding categories in Business Chemistry, DISC, and Gallup Strengths.
Continue reading
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a widely used personality assessment tool based on Carl Jung’s theory of psychological types. Developed by Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers, the MBTI classifies individuals into one of 16 personality types based on four dichotomies:
Continue reading
Deloitte’s Business Chemistry is a relatively newer player in the field of personality assessments, designed specifically for the workplace. It seeks to categorize individuals into one of four main types: Pioneers, Drivers, Integrators, and Guardians. While it has found a place in corporate settings and has its proponents, like all models, it’s essential to scrutinize its strengths and limitations critically.
Continue reading