Cyber risk has become an exercise in interpretation rather than reduction. The industry has over-optimised for modelling, scoring, and explaining exposure, often driven by consulting-led approaches that rely heavily on subjectivity and narrative. This piece argues that the real problem is upstream: data acquisition, normalisation, and comparability. Cyber Tzar was built to industrialise that problem, collapsing the time between discovery and action, and shifting organisations away from “bean counting” risk towards actually reducing it. The distinction is simple: attackers exploit exposure, not models.
Continue reading
No Cyber Idea: Why I Built Cyber Tzar (and Why I Don’t Buy the Consulting Model)
Leave a Reply
