Excellent article by Glenn Brunette on the “Top 5 Solaris 10 Security Features You Should Be Using” . …..
Category Archives: tech
Enterprise Architecture @ Sun Microsystems
Enjoy !
Enterprise Architecture @ Sun Microsystems
- Welcome to the Conference !
- Introductions
- Contents
- The 3 major uses of EA @ Sun Microsystems
- EA used internally at Sun
- Sun internal EA has delivered…
- EA used externally for Sun Customers : Why do customers involve Sun in there EA Programmes
- EA used externally for Sun Customers : Supporting customers EA teams helps Sun to…
- EA used externally for Sun Customers : Three EA case studies…
- EA case study no. 1 : A large Utility company : When EA goes ‘Bad’
- EA case study no. 2 : A large Government department : EA & SOA – the perfect marriage ?
- EA case study no. 2 : A large Government department : EA + SOA = SOA Adoption Roadmaps
- EA case study no. 3 : A large Government organisation : “It’s about the people, stupid !”
- Enterprise Architecture and Innovation…
- …using EA to perform customer analysis
- In Summary – Enterprise Architecture ‘Best Practises’
- Where can you get EA help at Sun Microsystems ? Try over here…
- Q&A;
- Thank you very much & enjoy the rest of the Conference !
Fin.
Related Links:
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/08/24/enterprise-architecture-sun-microsystems-presentation
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100713052715/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/enterprise_architecture_sun_microsystems_presentation
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/enterprise_architecture_sun_microsystems_presentation
Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference, 2007
I’ve finally prepared my slides from when I presented at the Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference, 2007, so just thought I’d finalise by covering the day and getting the slides online…
I have to say it was a great day – Enterprise Architecture (EA) is one of my favourite disciplines and getting to present on the subject for the conference was something I’d looked forward to since the previous years event.
The conference was hosted in Paris, at the Paris Hilton, just off the Sienne – it was hosted by the Open Group, and I was kindly asked to present by John Spencer, the recently retired Director of The Open Group’s Architecture Forum, and once I was there I was warmly welcomed by Allen Brown, the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Open Group.
As you can probably guess I’m very passionate about EA, in fact any (almost all) of the methods and techniques for getting a contextual, “Big Picture” view of an IT / IS estate ecosystem (what I like to call ‘Macro IT’) – and I’ll be writing a little more about some of these methods in latter posts.
As an industry we’ve been pretty successful to date about understanding and evolving the knowledge and experience around both Infrastructure and Applications. What we’ve been much less successful at, and I believe that it’s due to demand (and compromised by time to deliver), is understanding how these technologies, are put together as systems in a holistic manner, and how those systems themselves co-exist in Enterprise IT eco-systems (and to an extent how they compete with each other as ‘functional’ entities).
Last year when I presented at the Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference, 2006 (hosted in London), my slides were much more visual, and focused on how EA was being used at Sun, they were well received, but the comments afterwards were that they were too ‘high level’. So this year I decided to focus much more on Case Studies where we had been involved with Customers EA programmes. The change in direction must have worked because I got a half room standing ovation – the first I’ve received of that size (circa 200 there – I was still on a high about it for at least a couple of weeks).
Because of this there are two version, one with my speakers notes attached and one without – I’ve also created a ‘blog post from the slides (including the speakers notes) which I’ll put online tomorrow.
PDF with speakers notes |
PDF without speakers notes |
Last years slides are also available (“Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference 2006”), and are also on the ‘Architecting the Enterprise’ web site.
Related Links:
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/08/23/enterprise-architecture-practitioners-conference-2007
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100713052715/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/enterprise_architecture_practitioners_conference_2007
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/enterprise_architecture_practitioners_conference_2007
UK G2G revisited
Some advice from Ian Dunmore over at Public Sector Forums regarding the article I produced looking at UK G2G systems and there possible evolution.
He’s noted that there is some confusion about what I’m saying with these articles, with readers commenting that I’m suggesting that it is a way forward for the co-ordination of UK G2G systems.
Unfortunately I feel that would be too progressive, and that actually we need some mature discussion about the G2G systems in the UK, which are carrying a variety of data (including ‘Citizen’ data), before we start looking at what we should do about the co-ordination of these systems.
The message that I’m trying to get over is that:
- There are common usages of identity across the UK Government (“Identity Ontologies”).
- Around these common usages of identity G2G systems have ‘sprung up’.
- Given the projects known to be delivering in the near future, what will this ‘eco-system’ of UK G2G systems look like in the short term.
- Given what is known we can postulate a little further out to what the ‘eco-system’ of UK G2G systems might look like in the mid-term.
- The G2G systems in the UK are at different levels of maturity.
- The G2G systems in the UK have differing (technical) architectural topologies.
- Given the near future state of these G2G systems can we predict how they might evolve ?
- It’s likely that it will go in one of two ‘architectural’ directions:
- Either ‘point to point’ – with lots of ‘single’ connections between the major G2G systems, and there end-points – I call this the “Mesh” model.
- Or into a UK wide G2G messaging ‘back-bone’, into which the other major G2G systems will communicate – I call this the “Hub” model.
- However it’s also been postulated that the “Hub” model will be the direction that is taken – but that one of the existing UK G2G systems will take the place of the central G2G system that would be required for cross UK G2G communication.
- I’m not advocating any of the models listed above over any of the others – but I am trying to raise the visibility of the topic. Some of the questions and issues at large include:
- Shouldn’t someone be worrying about this for us – and planning it out in a sensible manner ?”
- Aren’t there security (primarily of information) issues ? What about the ‘Data Protection Act’ (DPA) ?
- Given the amount of ‘Functional Overlap’, i.e. systems performing the same (or very similar) function to it’s neighbour, shouldn’t we be looking at combining some of this together ? Otherwise won’t we end up building almost identical systems repeatedly ?
- Shouldn’t we try and achieve savings by combining physical infrastructure and hosting ?
- How does ‘Shared Services’ play into this ? How can this be done and achieve the ‘t-Gov’ agenda ?
- Is this ‘Citizen Centric’, and will it deliver to the majority of the population ? Should it be, given a number of the common usage of identity are not ‘Citizen Centric’ ?
- Increasingly isn’t this becoming a piece of ‘Critical National Infrastructure’ ? And thus needs a more appropriate focus from Government ?
- Some of these G2G systems are starting to move away from there original designs, what implications do these changes have, and have they been planned for appropriately ?
- These G2G systems are starting to be connected together – what issues does that bring to areas like the DPA ? And what other implications does this have in terms of these systems themselves ? Will these systems be flexible and agile enough to allow these new data communications (without costly re-engineering) ?
- Who should be looking into this, and managing it on behalf of the UK ? The Cabinet Office ? The Prime Ministers Delivery Unit (PMDU) ? The UK CIO, the CIO Council and the CTO Council ? The Security Services ? Or another body ?
I’m almost certain that other questions and issues will come to light, that’s one of the major reasons I’m working with the Public Sector Forums team to try and gather as much opinion as possible.
Once this is done I’m hoping we will be looking at building up some joint recommendations.
Given my background and role it would be extremely easy to start off with “well you could (or should) do it like this” – however, firstly, that’s not my style, and, secondly, my experience in the implementation of large scale IT systems has taught me to gather opinion up front – to be inclusive – and that’s the first step to delivering good technology solutions which meet there user’s requirements.
More soon – hopefully when we’re ready to start looking at some early recommendations…
UK G2G at the Public Sector Forums
Just to announce that we will be posting some recommendations regarding the evolution and strategic management of the UK G2G systems documented on this site over that last week or so. When I say we – well read on’t…
The extremely nice people over at Public Sector Forums (Hi Ian D. !) have been very kind about the overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems that I posted recently.
Public Sector Forums (PSF) is the leading online information service of it’s type focusing on all things ‘e-Gov’ and ‘e-Gov’ related in the UK – and I’ve been a fan for a number of years – ever since a friend of mine had an article posted with them (Alan Mather’s article ‘Ten Years of ‘e-Gov”).
Robin Wilton – one of Sun’s global Corporate Architect’s (with a particular focus on ‘Federated Identity’) and a co-chair of the Liberty Alliance’s Public Policy Expert Group (as well as being a participant in the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Identity Theft) said this about the PSF recently:
“Any readers who work in the UK Public Sector may already be aware of Ian Dunmore’s Public Sector Forums website (if not, check it out; it’s a look at UK public sector reality which is… frank and unvarnished, shall we say). To my frustration, I can’t get to the documents themselves, because (perhaps wisely) they don’t let tech vendors like me anywhere near the actual content, but even Ian’s regular newsletters are a welcome arrival in the inbox. He has a refreshing perspective and a great way with words. To the point: the most recent PSF newsletter included a link to the table of ID Fraud figures, so I headed over to take a look.
In a post about Sun Live ’07 earlier this year (which was excellent, by the way, and thanks to all of you who attended), Robin also had this to say about PSF: “These folks seem to know more about what’s going on in UK public sector organisations than the civil servants do themselves…” – so praise indeed.
So like Robin (above) and I, unless you work for a Public Sector organisation, you may find that you won’t be able to access the interesting content hosted by PSF, although the newsletter is still very much worth a read – and I would recommend subscribing if any aspect of your role touches into ‘UK Government IT’.
PSF has a really vibrant forum community, from across the whole of Government, and as such they have run an article on the work I’ve done looking at UK G2G messaging systems, with a goal of acting as a catalyst for discussion of the topic, and here’s the quote from PSF:
TECHTALK: G2G MESSAGING – A GURU SPEAKS
For the techies among you, especially anyone involved either with GC or working in central government. Wayne Horkan is Chief Technologist for Sun Microsystems for the UK and Ireland and – as a friend of ours puts it – ‘a ‘deeply passionate, technical guru who can conjure up a vision from a few words that few are sufficiently bright to grasp then articulate it in a detail that again only the brightest can grasp’. Wayne has worked on or reviewed just about every major IT project in government over the last few years and his is a voice to be reckoned with. Here we’re very pleased to bring you – lifted from his blog with permission – his fascinating look at G2G messaging systems currently running. This is important thinking and to be missed at the government’s peril since so far as he (or we) can tell it’s the only overview on the topic in existence and has therefore got to be a starting point for a sane look at enterprise architecture and shared services.
Pick it up at the following link: http://www.publicsectorforums.co.uk/page.cfm?pageID=3846
If you do work in the Public Sector, or Government, Education and Health (GEH) as it’s fashionably known, and you’d like to comment, just to let you know all the PSF forum comments will be ‘boiled down’ by the PSF team, and will go toward a set of recommendations we hope to jointly author regarding the evolution of the G2G systems in the UK. Obviously I’ll do the same with comments I receive here, and any I receive directly.
You can expect follow up postings on the subject that will give an update of where we are with the recommendations, and the recommendations themselves over the next couple of months.
Evolution of UK Government Messaging Systems
This is the third part of a three part overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems.
Specifically this post is looking at the “Evolution of Messaging Sub-Systems used by the UK Government” – given the current, and the near-future, state of UK G2G systems, how might we expect them to mature and evolve.
At a minimum I would recommend reading part one of this series of articles, “Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”.
That concludes my overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems – hope you enjoyed it.
Part one of this article, “Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”, and part two, “Comparison of Major Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”, are also avialiable.
As I mentioned in the first part of this series, I very much hope that at the very least the co-ordination of these G2G messaging systems will come under the remit of a cross UK government organisation, such as the CIO Council, and that John Suffolk, the UK Government CIO will be involved in supporting that initiative.
In a later post I will be looking at “Shared Services” in greater depth. Specifically at what “Shared Services” means to me, a value model (for judging how “Shared” that “Shared Service” is) and potential value calculator (I’ve got most of the content, just need time to get it online).
I will also delve into the Government Gateway, especially communication to and across it via Departmental Integrations Server (DIS) devices.
And I may even be up for a critique of the “UK Cross Government Enterprise Architecture”, hosted over at the UK Government’s CIO Councils CTO Council website.
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/29/uk-government-messaging-subsystems-3
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_3
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_3
Comparison of Major Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government
This is the second part of a three part overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems.
Specifically this post is a “Comparison of Major Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”, looking in more detail at three of the largest UK G2G systems and contrasting them with each other.
I’ve split it into two parts:
- Firstly a comparison of the major Identity Ontologies
- Secondly a comparison of three of the largest G2G systems in place
Comparison of the major Identity Ontologies
I’ve found that for any of these systems to truly deliver significant value they need to support four basic components. In fact this is no different of any large integration system found in any other sector. The four basic building block are:
- Internal (Back-End) Integration – preferably “Service” focused, there has to be a way to unlock the functionality and processing capability within the individual departments, organisations and authorities. Whether this is via a “Service Oriented Architecture” (SOA) or “Enterprise Application Integration” (EAI) a fundamental premise is that data can be sent and received from these “Back-End” systems.
- Shared Identity – An Ontology wide shared understanding of Identity is required for these disparate systems to share data and function with the correct level of authority.
- Messaging System / Backbone – An Ontology wide & inclusive G2G messaging system – unlike the internal messaging systems used within Departments, Organisations and Authorities (typically under one management team and are “closed systems”), the G2G systems are typically outside any single organisations monopolistic control, requiring participation from the wider membership of that Ontology to deliver data communication across it’s members.
- Access (Front-End) Gateway(s) – Portal or other Front-End access point – visibly delivers much of the value, which is actually brought into being by the previous three building blocks.
Table comparing the major Identity Ontologies
The table below shows each of the Ontologies I had identified in my earlier post, and rates them across the four areas described above.
Silobusters / Internal Integration | Common Ontology Wide Identity | G2G Messaging Subsystem(s) | Access Gateways | Other Notes | |
Citizen | Some Internal Integration – not yet focused upon the real-time provision of services | Yes – via the Government Gateway | Yes – via the Government Gateway | Mostly Organisation specific, some centralisation – via the Government Gateway | Only Ontology heavily in production – Hub & Spoke Model |
Justice | Little or no Internal Integration | None Defined / Agreed | Three Major messaging systems evolving – CJEX, Impact & DISC – natural segregation of case information | Mostly Organisation specific, very little centralisation (mapping to messaging systems) | Triple Hub Model evolving – Based around Data Segregation (“data firewalls” likely to be required) |
Immigration | None we are aware of (Little or no Internal Integration) | None – would heavily be based on Passport data for early revisions | None – Was due to have a single link to Police ‘Schengen’ Systems, however this has paused, as has our implementation of Schengen | Organisation specific | |
Transport | None we are aware of (Little or no Internal Integration) | None – would heavily be based on Driving License data for early revisions |
None we are aware of | Organisation specific | |
Health | Brownfield Integration at the Local Service Provider (LSP) level slowing – more research needed |
Some – evolving based around ‘Patient’ data | NHS Data Spine – 5 Sub-Hubs at the LSP – a Star Hub Model | Hub & 5 Sub-Hubs Model (Star Model) | |
Security | None we are aware of (Little or no Internal Integration) | Unknown by Author | SCOPE – No Data – Assume some inclusion of G2G type functionality | Unknown – Organisation specific ? | |
Military | None we are aware of (Little or no Internal Integration) | Unknown by Author | DII – No Data – Assume some inclusion of G2G type functionality | Unknown – Organisation specific ? | |
Education | None we are aware of (Little or no Internal Integration) | Unknown by Author | Currently under investigation | Mostly Organisation specific, very little centralisation | |
Other(s) | Fire Service ? |
If you can help fill out this table – then kindly get in touch (preferably via the “comment” mechanism at the bottom of this post) and I’ll be happy to republish with suggested amendments.
With hindsight what I feel that what I should have done with this table is break the Ontologies down into their constituent members – especially when looking at how much internal integration has been and is being planned to be delivered in the near future.
Comparison of three of the largest UK G2G systems
Now I’ll be looking in more detail at three major Messaging subsystems, and comparing them against each other.
The three major G2G messaging systems in government are:
- The Government Gateway (GG).
- The NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT) / Connecting for Health (CfH) Data SPINE.
- The messaging systems being developed in the Criminal Justice Ontology.
That completes part two of my overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems.
Again come back in a couple of days for the next instalment – the “Evolution of Messaging Sub-Systems used by the UK Government” – given the current, and the near-future, state of UK G2G systems, how might we expect them to mature and evolve.
Part one of this article, “Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”, is also available.
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/27/uk-government-messaging-subsystems-2
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_2
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_2
Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government
This is the first part of a three-part overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems.
Specifically, this post looks at “Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government” and is an overview of what’s in place, what’s not, and how I’ve classified them.
If you’ve been involved with Government, Education, and Health (GEH) IT implementations over the last few years, you will no doubt have come across some of the major G2G systems that have been developed, and are continuing to mature.
Since just before Tony Blair announced UK Online in September 2000, with a pledge to provide all government services online by 2005, there have been movements towards greater co-operation and joint working across the UK Government.
In the UK we’ve been hearing about “Joined-Up Government” and “Shared Services” for a number of years. Reports such as the Gershon Review, the Transformational Government Strategy and the Varney Report all call for government departments and organisations to work together to deliver more capabilities and greater savings.
With this drive towards greater cohesion, we have seen systems gravitate around what I call “Identity Ontologies” – Identity as understood and utilised by certain naturally grouped Government Organisations, Departments and Authorities. Sharing of Information is being done in departments which have a natural affinity for their peers, based around these Identity Ontologies.
For a number of reasons, security of information being exchanged being one, privacy and civil liberties being another, restriction of information (at least some of it) is, and will continue to be, limited across these Ontologies.
I was told by Brian Woodford, lately of Sun Microsystems UK, now at Tata Consulting and previously at BT, that in BT groupings similar to these are called UK Government “Communities of Interest” (COI), however as none of my BT contacts can confirm, nor deny this, I believe it to be both anecdotal and apocryphal.
Identity Ontologies
This diagram shows the major “Identity Ontologies” in the UK GEH arena.
Purposefully it does not show:
- Education Ontology – possibly a subset of Citizen, although currently they are looking at a National Programme which could also encompass Data Sharing across a G2G system.
- Fire Service (and related Emergency Services) – currently these fall under the remit of the Department for Communities and Local Government (DfCLG), however from 2001 to 2006 they had reported into the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), and before 2001 the Home Office. I believe they have an affinity to the Home Office based G2G system(s), although heavily related to those of the local authorities.
It’s very likely there may be other Ontologies, however given the conversations I have had with a number of senior civil servants and government IT professionals I believe it to be quite inclusive.
One of the most interesting items is that Local Government and Authorities often connect to almost all of these Ontologies.
Why does this stuff matter?
By understanding the current overall government IT landscape, and the systems under procurement we can postulate how the UK Government IT Landscape may mature and thus should “evolve”. Rather than these systems evolve into place, it is my belief that at the very least it should be overseen and planned in a strategic manner by a responsible government department, such as the CIO Council (led by the UK Government CIO, John Suffolk). This is very much along the lines of the the aim of Enterprise Architecture, and certainly has a relationship to Enterprise Architecture Planning.
Currently Sharing Services
Shows the major G2G messaging systems related to each Identity Ontology, and which organisations are sharing “information” via these messaging systems.
This diagram shows the “Identity Ontologies” represented by there underlining, and supporting, G2G messaging systems, and other end-point systems which had been connected up (or were due to connect up) by the start of 2006.
Obviously with subject matter is so large, and covering such a large IT eco-system, it has been necessary to abstract a certain level of detail out of this overview.
Aren’t the Departments, Organisation and Authorities already sharing information ?
Of course the UK Government shares massive amounts of data, much of it electronically, however the amount that is transmitted via G2G data exchanges, in a shared and common model, is much smaller (in number, if not volume) than the amount sent via point-to-point data exchanges.
The advantages of using a G2G system rather than relying on a large number of point-to-point data exchanges is that there is a significant reduction of effort in terms of connections and connection end-points which need to be built and maintained. It also allows the G2G communication to share frameworks such as error & exception handling, audit & traceability, security & inspection, and management information. These are very similar to the advantages found in Enterprise Application Integration (EAI).
Due to Deliver Shared Services Soon
Shows which organisations are due to share ‘information’ soon.
So this diagram shows which end-points are due to connect into their respective G2G systems, and thus share data soon.
The differences between this and the previous diagram are striking and obvious, and is due to the proliferation of integration and data sharing which is occurring, and is due to take place, across the UK Government IT eco-system.
Supporting Network Infrastructure
Shows the network backbone – in context.
Very similar to the last diagram – however shows there major sets of network infrastructure which underpin these messaging systems:
- The Citizen Identity Ontology focused GSI2 network.
- The Home Office related Police National Network (PNN3).
- The NHS NHSnet (actually being superseded by the NHS National Network or N3).
Most Likely Shared Services Model
Shows which organisations are most likely to share “information”.
Based upon the previous analysis, this diagram gives the best prediction for which systems would be connecting soon. The renewed focus on the road transport network and the advances being put forward to enable portions of the road traffic pricing mechanisms bear out some of my predictions.
Since these diagrams were drawn up a number of departments have undergone significant changes, however much of this analysis is still valid.
That completes this part of my overview of UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems.
Come back in the next couple of days for the second part – “Comparison of Major Messaging Sub-Systems in the UK Government”, looking in more detail at three of the largest UK G2G systems and contrasting them with each other.
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/25/uk-government-messaging-subsystems-1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_1
UK Government G2G Messaging Sub-Systems
Just to say that over the next weeks posting’s I will be looking at UK Government Messaging Sub-Systems. ….. 5 Trackbacks
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/uk-government-messaging-subsystems-0
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_0
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_government_messaging_subsystems_0
Sous-systèmes de transmission de messages dans le gouvernement Britannique
C’est la première partie d’une vue d’ensemble de trois parts des sous-systèmes BRITANNIQUES de transmission de messages du gouvernement G2G . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/britanniques-gouvernement-systemes-messages-1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/britanniques_gouvernement_syst%C3%A8mes_messages_1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/britanniques_gouvernement_syst%C3%A8mes_messages_1
영국 정부에 있는 전갈 하부 조직
이것은 영국 정부 G2G 전갈 하부 조직 의 3개 부품 개관의 첫번째 부분이다. …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/%EC%98%81%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80%EC%A0%84%EA%B0%88%ED%95%98%EB%B6%80%EC%A1%B0%EC%A7%81-1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%EC%98%81%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80%EC%A0%84%EA%B0%88%ED%95%98%EB%B6%80%EC%A1%B0%EC%A7%81_1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%EC%98%81%EA%B5%AD%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80%EC%A0%84%EA%B0%88%ED%95%98%EB%B6%80%EC%A1%B0%EC%A7%81_1
De Subsystemen van het overseinen in de Britse Overheid
Dit is het eerste deel van een driedelig overzicht van de Subsystemen van het Britse Overseinen van de Overheid G2G . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/vanhet-britse-subsystemen-1-overheidsoverseinen
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/vanhet_britse_subsystemen_1_overheidsoverseinen
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/vanhet_britse_subsystemen_1_overheidsoverseinen
Mitteilung-Subsysteme in der Britischen Regierung
Dieses ist das erste Teil eines Überblicks mit drei Teilen über BRITISCHE Mitteilung-Subsysteme der Regierungs-G2G . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/britische-regierungsmitteilungsubsysteme-1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/britische_regierungsmitteilungsubsysteme_1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/britische_regierungsmitteilungsubsysteme_1
Przesyłanie wiadomości Sub-Systems w the UK Rząd
To być the pierwszy część trzy część przegląd UK Rząd G2G Przesyłanie wiadomości Sub-Systems . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/uk-rzadowy-przesylanie-wiadomosci-podsystem1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_rz%C4%85dowy_przesy%C5%82anie_wiadomo%C5%9Bci_podsystem1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_rz%C4%85dowy_przesy%C5%82anie_wiadomo%C5%9Bci_podsystem1
Subsistemas da mensagem no governo Britânico
Esta é a primeira parte de uma vista geral de três porções de subsistemas BRITÂNICOS da mensagem do governo G2G.
Especificamente este borne olha da “subsistemas mensagem no governo BRITÂNICO” e é uma vista geral do que sejam in place, do que não sejam, e como mim os classific.
Se você estêve envolvido com o governo, a instrução, e a saúde (GEH) ELE execuções sobre os últimos anos, você terá vindo sem dúvida através de alguns dos sistemas principais de G2G que foram desenvolvidos, e está continuando a amadurecer-se.
Desde que imediatamente antes que Tony Blair anunciou em linha BRITÂNICO em setembro de 2000, com uma garantia fornecer em linha todos os serviços governamentais em 2005, houve uns movimentos para a maior côoperação e uma junção que trabalha através do governo BRITÂNICO.
No Reino Unido nós fomos audição sobre “o governo Juntado-Acima” e “serviços compartilhados” por um número de anos. Os relatórios tais como a revisão de Gershon, a estratégia transformacional do governo e o Varney relatam toda a chamada para que departamentos governamentais e as organizações trabalhem junto para entregar mais capacidades e maiores economias.
Com esta movimentação para a maior coesão, nós vimos sistemas gravitar em torno do que eu chamo da “Ontologies identidade” – identidade como compreendida e utilizada por determinados organizações, departamentos e autoridades naturalmente agrupados do governo. A partilha da informação está sendo feita nos departamentos que têm uma afinidade natural para lá pares, baseados em torno destes Ontologies da identidade.
Para um número de razões, segurança da informação que está sendo trocada ser uma, privacidade e as liberdades civis que são outro, limitação da informação (pelo menos algumas dele) é, e continuará a ser, limitado através destes Ontologies.
Eu fui dito por Brian Woodford, ultimamente de Sun Microsystems Reino Unido, agora em Tata consultando e previamente no BT, que nos agrupamentos do BT similares a estes são chamados o governo BRITÂNICO as “comunidades do interesse” (COI), porém como nenhuns de meus contatos do BT podem confirmar, nem negam este, eu acredito-o para ser anedótico e apocryphal.
Isso termina esta parte de minha vista geral de subsistemas BRITÂNICOS da mensagem do governo G2G.
Voltado nos pares de dias seguintes para a segunda parte – “comparação de subsistemas principais da mensagem no governo BRITÂNICO”, olhando mais detalhadamente em três dos sistemas os maiores do Reino Unido G2G e contrastando os um com o otro.
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/subsistemas-britanicos-1-mensagem-governo
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/subsistemas_brit%C3%A2nicos_1_mensagem_governo
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/subsistemas_brit%C3%A2nicos_1_mensagem_governo
传讯子系统在英国政府
这是 英国政府G2G传讯子系统 三部分概要的第一个部分。 特别地这个岗位在英国政府看“传讯子系统”并且是什么到位,什么概要不是,并且我怎么分类了他们。 如果您介入了以政府、教育和健康(GEH)它在过去几年实施,您无疑遇到了被开发了的某些主要G2G系统和继续成熟。 因为,在托尼・布莱尔宣布了英国在网上在2000年之前9月,以在网上提供所有政府工作的承诺在2005年以前,有运作横跨英国政府的运动往更加伟大的合作和联接。 在英国我们是听力关于“被加入的政府”和“共有的服务”几年。. …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/%E8%8B%B1%E5%9B%BD%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E4%BC%A0%E8%AE%AF%E5%AD%90%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F1
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%E8%8B%B1%E5%9B%BD%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E4%BC%A0%E8%AE%AF%E5%AD%90%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F1
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%E8%8B%B1%E5%9B%BD%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E4%BC%A0%E8%AE%AF%E5%AD%90%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F1
Sottosistemi di messaggio nel governo Britannico
Ciò è la prima parte di una descrizione delle tre parti dei sottosistemi BRITANNICI di messaggio di governo G2G . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/sottosistemi-britannici-1-messaggio-governo
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/sottosistemi_britannici_1_messaggio_governo
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/sottosistemi_britannici_1_messaggio_governo
Messagingundersystem i UK regeringen
Denna är den första delen av en överblick för del tre av UK Messagingundersystem för regeringen G2G . …..
イギリスの政府のメッセージサブシステム
これは イギリスの政府G2Gのメッセージサブシステム の3部の概観の最初の部分である。 具体的にはこのポストはないものがの、そして私それらを分類したいかに、ものを設置されている「イギリスの政府のメッセージサブシステム」を見、概観にである。 政府、教育および健康(GEH)にそれここ数年にわたって実施かかわったら、間違いなく開発された出くわし、成熟し続けている主要なG2Gシステムのいくつかに。 . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AE%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B9%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%83%A1%E3%83%83%E3%82%BB%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%82%B5%E3%83%96%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%83%A01
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AE%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B9%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%83%A1%E3%83%83%E3%82%BB%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%82%B5%E3%83%96%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%83%A01
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AE%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B9%E3%81%AE%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E3%81%AE%E3%83%A1%E3%83%83%E3%82%BB%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%82%B5%E3%83%96%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%83%A01
Sub-Systems послания в UK правительстве
Это будет первая часть обзора 3 частей UK Sub-Systems послания правительства G2G . …..
- Recovered link: https://horkan.com/2007/06/22/uk-subsystems-1-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0
- Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100715130842/http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_subsystems_1_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0
- Original link:
http://blogs.sun.com/eclectic/entry/uk_subsystems_1_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0