Tag Archives: 1984

Dystopian Novels Compared… Orwell vs. Huxley

“Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley and “1984” by George Orwell are two of the most well-known dystopian novels, each painting a bleak picture of a future society controlled by a totalitarian regime. While both novels depict a world where individual freedom is curtailed, they approach the theme in different ways, with “Brave New World” focusing on a society where people are manipulated into compliance through pleasure and conditioning, while “1984” portrays a world where fear, surveillance, and brute force are used to maintain control.

Continue reading

Wikipedia – Historical Revisionism, Negationism and Dystopian Fiction

Wikipedia reminds me ever so much of Winston Smith’s job in 1984 by George Orwell (or Eric Blair), as I recall Winston constantly rewrites the past to suit the needs of the present.

Surprisingly however (or not) Wikipedia’s entry for ‘Historical Revisionism (Negationism)’ doesn’t include any references to itself.

The chap in ‘Brazil’, the 1985 film by Terry Gilliam, has the same, or very similar, job to Winston, as I further recall.

My favourite ‘traditional’ dystopian story is Malcolm Bradbury’sFahrenheit 451‘, although I enjoyed Alan Moore’sV for Vendetta‘ when it came out in 18 years ago, when I was 18, in 1988.

However I suspect that I’ll enjoy Aldous Huxley’sBrave New World‘, when I eventually get around to reading it (although I didn’t get on with his ‘The Doors of Perception (1954)‘ which I read half-heartedly at 14).

I appear to have read, and own, an unhealthy amount of the material on Wikipedia’s list of dystopian literature – strangely my favourite author of ‘unsettling’ dystopian fiction, J. G. Ballard, doesn’t make the list at all – perhaps because Ballard focuses on the dysfunctional present and our dystopian modernity rather than a far flung fiction.

So is Wikipedia the symbol and reminder of our current dystopian situation or a of the good that can be derived from the “Hive Mind” and it’s approach to collectively working together to break down social, intelectual and technical problems ?

Of course the real truth is that for all the good that Wikipedia does it is still the great ‘Lowest Common Denominator‘ in many cases – and perhaps this isn’t such as bad thing as long as people are aware of it’s limitations, using it accordingly – long may it (and it descendants) reign.